Month: March 2018

We often receive questions from DRC members asking about how to properly read a CFIA inspection. In this three part series, we will look at the importance of reviewing the information on the inspection certificate. To begin, let’s focus on the elements in the first section as well as the product description section.

The first section of the certificate contains the “requested and performed date and time” for the inspection. This information is important because it helps to establish if the inspection was requested and performed in a timely manner. For example, truck shipments require the inspection to be requested within 8 working hours after the receiver is given notice of arrival and the produce is made accessible for inspection. Boat and rail shipments however allow the inspection to be requested within 24 working hours after the receiver is given notice of arrival and the product has been placed in a location where the produce is made accessible for inspection.

The field “where inspected” indicates the area the inspection took place such as the applicant’s warehouse, the consignee’s warehouse, or any other location. If the product was still loaded when the inspector arrived on site, that information should be noted under the “remarks” section.

An important area to review is the “remarks” section at the bottom of the inspection certificate which will include notes the inspector has made about the location of the load, if it was still loaded on the truck or if it was unloaded. This could help determine if the buyer/receiver still has the right to reject the product. For information on “Acts of Acceptance” please review Section 19.1 of the DRC Trading Standards

Information about the applicant, shipper and consignee

The information in this section identifies the parties involved in the transaction. If there is a name under any of these fields with which you are not familiar, you will want to address this with your customer.

Product description

This section should include detailed information about the load such as product, variety, size, maturity, grade and colour, packages (number of cartons or bags available for inspection), type of count and weight.

This information needs to match your invoice and/or purchase order. For example, if you receive a load of different size mangoes at a different price per unit, a discussion for a request for an inspection by size needs to occur.

Another major issue that we often see is the number of cartons inspected. The entire load should be available for inspection. If not, the buyer/receiver needs to have a valid reason as to why the full load was not available.

As a general rule more than 75% of the load must be available for sampling to be considered representative of the full load.

In part 2 of our series on how to properly read an inspection certificate, we will review temperatures and defects.

The proposed Safe Food for Canadians Regulations (SFCR) are expected to come into force late spring or early summer. Once implemented, a DRC membership is mandatory for Canadians to buy, sell, import or export fresh fruits and vegetables. Under the existing Canada Agricultural Products Act (CAP Act), the current requirement is to secure either a CFIA Produce Licence or a DRC membership to be in regulatory compliance. Under the new regulations, there will only be one option: a DRC membership. This change will require some modifications to the way DRC currently conducts business.

We will be proposing housekeeping changes to the DRC By-laws and related in-house administrative procedures at our next Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Members in June 2018. These changes relate primarily to increasing the transparency of our membership application and membership maintenance processes. As we get closer to the AGM and in keeping with current By-laws, we will provide members with the proposed changes along with explanatory notes to help members understand the new By-law changes and how they will work on a day-to-day basis.

Hopefully you have been able to take part in some of our recent outreach activities. If you haven’t but are interested in learning more about the proposed SFCR, please contact our office we will be happy to help walk you through the draft regulations.

For additional information please contact:

DRC Help Desk | 613-234-0982 | [email protected]

Implementation of the Safe Food for Canadians Regulations (SFCR) is quickly approaching and with it, the regulatory requirement for a DRC membership for Canadians.

SFCR is expected to come into force late spring or early summer. Once implemented, a DRC membership is mandatory for Canadians who buy, sell, import or export fresh fruits and vegetables with few exceptions (see below for link to determine if you are exempt).

Under the existing Canada Agricultural Products Act (CAP Act), the current requirement is to secure either a CFIA Produce Licence or a DRC membership to be in regulatory compliance. Under the new regulations, there will only be one option: a DRC membership.

When it comes to SFCR, there are important distinctions: the regulations address food safety and traceability (Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) licence) as well as trade and commerce (a DRC membership is required to engage in the trade of fresh fruits and vegetables). All references to licence in the SFCR pertain to food safety and traceability; reference to a DRC membership pertains to trade and commerce. DRC’s role and responsibility within SFCR relate only to trade and commerce.

What do Canadians need to do?

1. Be aware of, and understand, the SFCR regulatory requirement for a DRC membership to buy, sell, import or export fresh fruits and vegetables.
2. Visit the DRC website and refer to the self-assessment tools to determine whether you are subject to the regulatory requirement or are exempt. https://fvdrc.com/sfcr/

If you are exporting to Canada, ensure that you sell to or buy from a DRC member.

For additional information or to schedule a presentation from a DRC team member, please contact:

DRC Help Desk | 613-234-0982 | [email protected]

Most disputes between members are solved with the help of DRC Staff during the informal consultation process. Some disputes however end up in the formal process where an arbitrator is appointed with the cooperation of the claimant and the respondent. That arbitrator must make a decision based on what is presented to them by the parties. We have seen some arbitration cases where if the claimant or the respondent had made a better presentation to the arbitrator, the arbitrator might have reconsidered their decision.

1. The informal file handled by DRC staff is closed and the arbitrator does not see it.
   During the informal process many documents and issues are exchanged and explored.  The informality of this process allows the parties to go back and forth several times, review information, and make offers or counter offers. Firms may also discover an error or a new issue during this exchange. For the above reasons the informal file is sealed to avoid misleading the arbitrator. Do not assume that the arbitrator will have access to the information submitted during the informal consultation process. You have to make sure you resubmit all the information favouring your claim or defence.

2. A party refers to a contract or other document but fails to provide it.
   Parties often reference agreements, contracts, emails, market reports, etc. in presenting their case.  A statement without supporting documentation is of limited evidentiary value, especially when the other party has presented documentation in support of their position. If you are referencing a document, ensure it makes it to your exhibits when presenting your case.

3. A party assumes the arbitrator has specific knowledge of a particular issue.
   The arbitrators that are selected for DRC cases are familiar with the industry and DRC rules.   They cannot however be expected to know everything about every commodity or unique steps in the supply chain.  An arbitrator is no different than a judge in court; they are not going to investigate or make your case for you. You are responsible to make and defend your own case.

Obviously, no one likes to lose a case. Unfortunately, we do see cases where a party fails to prevail in their case not because of what they presented, but because of what they failed to present. It is unfortunate when a case is lost not on its merits, but rather because essential material was not provided to the arbitrator. Be prepared and avoid these top three pitfalls.